[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67a9d32a-0a20-f101-4660-0d5aa5ad8a8a@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:44:50 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 10/16] ARM: dts: zynq: Add generic compatible
string for I2C EEPROM
Hi,
On 23.8.2017 16:28, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
>> On 15.6.2017 20:54, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>> The at24 driver allows to register I2C EEPROM chips using different vendor
>>> and devices, but the I2C subsystem does not take the vendor into account
>>> when matching using the I2C table since it only has device entries.
>>>
>>> But when matching using an OF table, both the vendor and device has to be
>>> taken into account so the driver defines only a set of compatible strings
>>> using the "atmel" vendor as a generic fallback for compatible I2C devices.
>>>
>>> So add this generic fallback to the device node compatible string to make
>>> the device to match the driver using the OF device ID table.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
>>>
>
> [snip]
>
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts
>>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>> reg = <2>;
>>> eeprom@54 {
>>> - compatible = "at,24c08";
>>> + compatible = "atmel,24c08";
>>> reg = <0x54>;
>>> };
>>> };
>>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>>
>
> Same question than for the other patch, could you please also apply this?
>
> Sorry for not being clear in the cover letter that the patches could
> be applied independently.
Ok. Applied to
https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commits/zynq/dt
Will wait if something else pop up.
Arnd: If you want to take this directly, feel free to do it.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists