[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170824135805.GB28443@kwain>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:58:05 +0200
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, kishon@...com, jason@...edaemon.net,
sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, nadavh@...vell.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mw@...ihalf.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
miquel.raynal@...e-electrons.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/13] phy: add the mvebu cp110 comphy driver
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:45:04PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > + for_each_available_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
> > + struct mvebu_comphy_lane *lane;
> > + struct phy *phy;
> > + int ret;
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &val);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing 'reg' property (%d)\n",
> > + ret);
> > + continue;
> > + }
>
> I'm just wondering why we need this. We know how many lanes there are
> from the table. So just create a generic PHY for each lane?
At first I did this statically. I moved to this solution because:
1. It represents the h/w correctly (there are 6 lanes duplicated here).
2. It eases the dt representation, we would have something like:
<&cpm_comphy 0 1>; otherwise.
3. If the number of lanes changes in future revisions it'll be quite
easy to handle.
Thanks!
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists