[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170824160821.GG17193@bill-the-cat>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:08:21 -0400
From: Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>,
Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: rt5677: Reintroduce I2C device IDs
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 06:06:20PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:54:37 +0200,
> Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:52:35PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 05:42:11PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > >
> > > > OK, so the fix for 4.13 would be either to cherry-pick this commit, or
> > > > just to re-add "RT5677CE:00" to i2c_id temporarily as a quick band-aid
> > > > fix (and remove again in 4.14).
> > >
> > > > The former is cleaner, but it's bigger, while the latter is a safer
> > > > oneliner at the late RC stage.
> > >
> > > > I leave the decision to Mark.
> > >
> > > I'm happier with the oneline change TBH, like you say it's pretty late
> > > in the release cycle. Can you just apply the patch directly and send it
> > > to Linus with my ack or should I put together a pull request?
> >
> > FWIW, I'd be happy to give the change a quick spin and Tested-by it.
>
> Well, it's your patch, after all :)
> Below is the patch I'm going to queue.
>
>
> Takashi
>
> -- 8< --
> From: Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5677: Reintroduce I2C device IDs
>
> Not all devices with ACPI and this combination of sound devices will
> have the required information provided via ACPI. Reintroduce the I2C
> device ID to restore sound functionality on on the Chromebook 'Samus'
> model.
>
> [ More background note:
> the commit a36afb0ab648 ("ASoC: rt5677: Introduce proper table...")
> moved the i2c ID probed via ACPI ("RT5677CE:00") to a proper
> acpi_device_id table. Although the action itself is correct per se,
> the overseen issue is the reference id->driver_data at
> rt5677_i2c_probe() for retrieving the corresponding chip model for
> the given id. Since id=NULL is passed for ACPI matching case, we get
> an Oops now.
>
> We already have queued more fixes for 4.14 and they already address
> the issue, but they are bigger changes that aren't preferable for the
> late 4.13-rc stage. So, this patch just papers over the bug as a
> once-off quick fix for a particular ACPI matching. -- tiwai ]
>
> Fixes: a36afb0ab648 ("ASoC: rt5677: Introduce proper table for ACPI enumeration")
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> ---
> sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c
> index 36e530a36c82..6f629278d982 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c
> @@ -5021,6 +5021,7 @@ static const struct regmap_config rt5677_regmap = {
> static const struct i2c_device_id rt5677_i2c_id[] = {
> { "rt5677", RT5677 },
> { "rt5676", RT5676 },
> + { "RT5677CE:00", RT5677 },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, rt5677_i2c_id);
Looks good, thanks for rewording things!
--
Tom
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists