linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] of/device: Fix of_device_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:51:14 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/device: Fix of_device_get_modalias() buffer handling

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> of_device_request_module() calls of_device_get_modalias() with "len" 0,
> to calculate the size of the buffer needed to store the result, but due
> to integer promotion the ssize_t "len" will be compared as unsigned with
> strlen(compat) and the loop will generally never break. This results in
> a call to snprintf() with a negative len, which triggers below warning,
> followed by a dereference of a invalid pointer:
>
>   [    3.060067] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 51 at lib/vsprintf.c:2122 vsnprintf+0x348/0x6d8
>   ...
>   [    3.060301] [<ffffff800891ede8>] vsnprintf+0x348/0x6d8
>   [    3.060308] [<ffffff800891f248>] snprintf+0x48/0x50
>   [    3.060316] [<ffffff80086a7c80>] of_device_get_modalias+0x108/0x160
>   [    3.060322] [<ffffff80086a7cf8>] of_device_request_module+0x20/0x88
>   ...
>
> Further more of_device_get_modalias() is supposed to return the number
> of bytes needed to store the entire modalias, so the loop needs to
> continue accumulate the total size even though the buffer is full.
>
> Finally the function is not expected to ensure space for the NUL, nor
> include it in the returned size, so only 1 should be added to the length
> of "compat" in the loop (to account for the character 'C').
>
> Fixes: bc575064d688 ("of/device: use of_property_for_each_string to parse compatible strings")
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/of/device.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c
> index 6f33a0e0d351..7cff599a9c6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/device.c
> @@ -195,10 +195,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_device_get_match_data);
>
>  static ssize_t of_device_get_modalias(struct device *dev, char *str, ssize_t len)
>  {
> -       const char *compat, *start = str;
> +       const char *compat;
>         char *c;
>         struct property *p;
>         ssize_t csize;
> +       ssize_t tsize;
>
>         if ((!dev) || (!dev->of_node))
>                 return -ENODEV;
> @@ -206,12 +207,16 @@ static ssize_t of_device_get_modalias(struct device *dev, char *str, ssize_t len
>         /* Name & Type */
>         csize = snprintf(str, len, "of:N%sT%s", dev->of_node->name,
>                          dev->of_node->type);
> +       tsize = csize;
>         len -= csize;
> -       str += csize;
> +       if (str)
> +               str += csize;
>
>         of_property_for_each_string(dev->of_node, "compatible", p, compat) {
> -               if (strlen(compat) + 2 > len)
> -                       break;
> +               csize = strlen(compat) + 1;
> +               tsize += csize;
> +               if (csize > len)
> +                       continue;
>
>                 csize = snprintf(str, len, "C%s", compat);

We could just use the snprintf to give us the length. Something like
this following the snprintf:

tsize +=csize;
if (csize > len) {
  if (len) {
    str[0] = '\0';
    len = 0;
  }
  continue;
}

You'd need to prevent len from going negative up above too. It ends up
being more lines but you save a strlen call. So perhaps it's fine as
is, but since I've written it already throwing it out there...

Rob