linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: don't select CPUFREQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:47:52 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: don't select CPUFREQ_DT

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:

> The new 'select CPUFREQ_DT' statement causes a warning in some
> configurations:
>
> warning: (ARCH_U8500) selects CPUFREQ_DT which has unmet direct dependencies (CPU_FREQ && HAVE_CLK && OF && (!CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL))
>
> No other platform does this, so I think for consistency it's
> best if we remove it again from ux500 and instead add the driver
> to the defconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

OK then. I should update the defconfig anyway.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Rafael, can you stick this on top of the other patches on
your cpufreq branch?

Yours,
Linus Walleij