[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1708242153000.3581@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:56:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>
cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxwifi@...el.com, rui.zhang@...el.com, edubezval@...il.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, david.weinehall@...el.com,
johannes.berg@...el.com, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
sara.sharon@...el.com, emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iwlwifi: pcie: move rx workqueue initialization to
iwl_trans_pcie_alloc()
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > Work queues cannot be allocated when a mutex is held because the mutex
> > may be in use and that would make it sleep. Doing so generates the
> > following splat with 4.13+:
> >
> > [ 19.513298] ======================================================
> > [ 19.513429] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> > [ 19.513557] 4.13.0-rc5+ #6 Not tainted
> > [ 19.513638] ------------------------------------------------------
> > [ 19.513767] cpuhp/0/12 is trying to acquire lock:
> > [ 19.513867] (&tz->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff924afebb>] thermal_zone_get_temp+0x5b/0xb0
> > [ 19.514047]
> > [ 19.514047] but task is already holding lock:
> > [ 19.514166] (cpuhp_state){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff91cc4baa>] cpuhp_thread_fun+0x3a/0x210
> > [ 19.514338]
> > [ 19.514338] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> >
> > This lock dependency already existed with previous kernel versions,
> > but it was not detected until commit 49dfe2a67797 ("cpuhotplug: Link
> > lock stacks for hotplug callbacks") was introduced.
> >
> > Reported-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@...el.com>
> > Reported-by: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
>
> Jiri, did you have a chance to try this out? I'm about to ask Kalle to
> merge this so it gets in in time for 4.13-rc7.
Sorry, I am almost completely offline for one more week (vacation), and
will not have access to the affected system before that. But this indeed
looks like a correct fix to me, so feel free to add
Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
I'll be able to provide my Tested-by: eventually only in ~10 days.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists