lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Aug 2017 23:23:01 +0200
From:   Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com
Subject: [PATCH 04/17] drbd: Send P_NEG_ACK upon write error in protocol != C

From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>

In protocol != C, we forgot to send the P_NEG_ACK for failing writes.

Once we no longer submit to local disk, because we already "detached",
due to the typical "on-io-error detach;" config setting,
we already send the neg acks right away.

Only those requests that have been submitted,
and have been error-completed by the local disk,
would forget to send the neg-ack,
and only in asynchronous replication (protocol != C).
Unless this happened during resync,
where we already always send acks, regardless of protocol.

The primary side needs the P_NEG_ACK in order to mark
the affected block(s) for resync in its out-of-sync bitmap.

If the blocks in question are not re-written again,
we may miss to resync them later, causing data inconsistencies.

This patch will always send the neg-acks, and also at least try to
persist the out-of-sync status on the local node already.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
index 2745db2..72cb0bd 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
@@ -128,6 +128,14 @@ void drbd_endio_write_sec_final(struct drbd_peer_request *peer_req) __releases(l
 	block_id = peer_req->block_id;
 	peer_req->flags &= ~EE_CALL_AL_COMPLETE_IO;
 
+	if (peer_req->flags & EE_WAS_ERROR) {
+		/* In protocol != C, we usually do not send write acks.
+		 * In case of a write error, send the neg ack anyways. */
+		if (!__test_and_set_bit(__EE_SEND_WRITE_ACK, &peer_req->flags))
+			inc_unacked(device);
+		drbd_set_out_of_sync(device, peer_req->i.sector, peer_req->i.size);
+	}
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&device->resource->req_lock, flags);
 	device->writ_cnt += peer_req->i.size >> 9;
 	list_move_tail(&peer_req->w.list, &device->done_ee);
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ