[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170824.143230.1441873385968459116.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: colin.king@...onical.com
Cc: aviad.krawczyk@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] net: hinic: fix comparison of a uint16_t type
with -1
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 16:39:36 +0100
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The comparison of hw_ioctxt.rx_buf_sz_idx == -1 is always false because
> rx_buf_sz_idx is a uint16_t. Fix this by explicitly casting -1 to uint16_t.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1454559 ("Operands don't affect result")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c
> index 09dec6de8dd5..71e26070fb7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c
> @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int set_hw_ioctxt(struct hinic_hwdev *hwdev, unsigned int rq_depth,
> }
> }
>
> - if (hw_ioctxt.rx_buf_sz_idx == -1)
> + if (hw_ioctxt.rx_buf_sz_idx == (uint16_t)-1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> hw_ioctxt.sq_depth = ilog2(sq_depth);
This is really silly.
The code in question is trying to convert a size (HINIC_RX_BUF_SZ)
into a table index, using a loop.
It should just compute this at compile time and do away with this
overly confusing code.
Even a switch statement would be much better and the compiler
would optimize the whole away into a single assignment in
the generated code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists