[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7hd17kh5rp.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:04:26 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] mmc: meson-gx: use CCF to handle the clock phases
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com> writes:
> Several phases can be controlled on the meson-gx controller, the core, tx
> and rx clock phase. The tx and rx uses delays to allow for a more fine
> grained setting of the phase. To properly compute the phase using delays,
> accessing the clock rate is necessary.
>
> Instead of ad-hoc functions, use the common clock framework to set the
> clock phases (and access the clock rate while doing it).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
I have to admit to not fully understanding the MMC tuning aspsects here,
but I like this approach to using the clock framework for handling the
extra clocks.
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists