lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEUhbmWihuxtF81qf6MD9k2ViUvY3AjBr4uHE1kGWj-iptqffg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2017 20:11:54 +0800
From:   Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stefan Roese <sr@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi-nor: intel-spi: Fix Kconfig dependency to LPC_ICH

Hi Mika,

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 01:12:51AM -0700, Bin Meng wrote:
>> The Intel SPI-NOR driver is dependent on LPC_ICH to get the platform
>> data. Select it in the Kconfig.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig
>> index bfdfb1e..e998800 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig
>> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ config SPI_INTEL_SPI_PLATFORM
>>       tristate "Intel PCH/PCU SPI flash platform driver" if EXPERT
>>       depends on X86
>>       select SPI_INTEL_SPI
>> +     select LPC_ICH
>
> How about
>
>         depends on X86 && LPC_ICH
>
> instead?

Other LPC_ICH users (like gpio, watchdog) use the 'select' logic, so I
would prefer to keep things consistent.

Regards,
Bin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ