[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170825155111.GD30922@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 17:51:11 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kishon@...com, jason@...edaemon.net,
sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, nadavh@...vell.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mw@...ihalf.com, stefanc@...vell.com,
miquel.raynal@...e-electrons.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] net: mvpp2: comphy configuration
> - Checked if the carrier_on/off functions were needed. They are.
Hi Antoine
Could you explain the situations they are needed in?
Quite a few drivers do this, so i'm not saying it is wrong. But it
would be nice to understand if we are missing something in phylib.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists