[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170825120910.56114755@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:09:10 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 12/41] x86/mce: Remove duplicated tracing interrupt code
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:31:15 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
> @@ -776,24 +776,12 @@ static void __log_error(unsigned int ban
> mce_log(&m);
> }
>
> -static inline void __smp_deferred_error_interrupt(void)
> -{
> - inc_irq_stat(irq_deferred_error_count);
> - deferred_error_int_vector();
> -}
> -
> asmlinkage __visible void __irq_entry smp_deferred_error_interrupt(void)
> {
> entering_irq();
> - __smp_deferred_error_interrupt();
> - exiting_ack_irq();
> -}
> -
> -asmlinkage __visible void __irq_entry smp_trace_deferred_error_interrupt(void)
> -{
> - entering_irq();
> trace_deferred_error_apic_entry(DEFERRED_ERROR_VECTOR);
> - __smp_deferred_error_interrupt();
> + inc_irq_stat(irq_deferred_error_count);
Here we do the inc_irq_stat() after the tracepoint (same as the
original).
> + deferred_error_int_vector();
> trace_deferred_error_apic_exit(DEFERRED_ERROR_VECTOR);
> exiting_ack_irq();
> }
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
> @@ -390,26 +390,12 @@ static void unexpected_thermal_interrupt
>
> static void (*smp_thermal_vector)(void) = unexpected_thermal_interrupt;
>
> -static inline void __smp_thermal_interrupt(void)
> -{
> - inc_irq_stat(irq_thermal_count);
> - smp_thermal_vector();
> -}
> -
> -asmlinkage __visible void __irq_entry
> -smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> - entering_irq();
> - __smp_thermal_interrupt();
> - exiting_ack_irq();
> -}
> -
> -asmlinkage __visible void __irq_entry
> -smp_trace_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +asmlinkage __visible void __irq_entry smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *r)
> {
> entering_irq();
> + inc_irq_stat(irq_thermal_count);
> trace_thermal_apic_entry(THERMAL_APIC_VECTOR);
Here we do the inc_irq_stat() after the tracepoint (swapped from the
original). Was that intentional?
> - __smp_thermal_interrupt();
> + smp_thermal_vector();
> trace_thermal_apic_exit(THERMAL_APIC_VECTOR);
> exiting_ack_irq();
> }
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/threshold.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/threshold.c
> @@ -17,24 +17,12 @@ static void default_threshold_interrupt(
>
> void (*mce_threshold_vector)(void) = default_threshold_interrupt;
>
> -static inline void __smp_threshold_interrupt(void)
> -{
> - inc_irq_stat(irq_threshold_count);
> - mce_threshold_vector();
> -}
> -
> asmlinkage __visible void __irq_entry smp_threshold_interrupt(void)
> {
> entering_irq();
> - __smp_threshold_interrupt();
> - exiting_ack_irq();
> -}
> -
> -asmlinkage __visible void __irq_entry smp_trace_threshold_interrupt(void)
> -{
> - entering_irq();
> trace_threshold_apic_entry(THRESHOLD_APIC_VECTOR);
> - __smp_threshold_interrupt();
> + inc_irq_stat(irq_threshold_count);
Back to inc_irq_stat() after the tracepoint.
-- Steve
> + mce_threshold_vector();
> trace_threshold_apic_exit(THRESHOLD_APIC_VECTOR);
> exiting_ack_irq();
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists