[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1503751772-158812-1-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 20:49:32 +0800
From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>, <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
<yunlong.song@...oud.com>, <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
CC: <miaoxie@...wei.com>, <bintian.wang@...wei.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: discard small invalid blocks in current active segments
1. write file A with 5 blocks to current empty active segment
2. remove file A
3. write checkpoint
4. write file B with 507 blocks to the same active segment
If file B is alive all the time, the blocks used by file A will never be
discarded. So current active segment should also be treated as a candidate
for small discards.
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 8375257..a2e7c8f 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1339,7 +1339,9 @@ static bool add_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc,
return false;
if (!force) {
- if (!test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) || !se->valid_blocks ||
+ if (!test_opt(sbi, DISCARD) ||
+ (!se->valid_blocks &&
+ !IS_CURSEG(sbi, cpc->trim_start)) ||
SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->nr_discards >=
SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->max_discards)
return false;
--
1.8.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists