[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1503761195.12569.43.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 08:26:35 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Yurii Pavlenko <pyldev@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, pkshih@...ltek.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging rtlwifi efuse fix up a warning kzalloc
On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 09:48 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> I will NACK every
> patch that tries to force code that I maintain to use kcalloc over kzalloc.
Your choice.
The concept behind the kzalloc with multiply vs kcalloc
is protection against multiplication overflow.
It's unlikely to solve any real problem with a
sizeof(foo) * small known number of entries.
It does have application when number of entries is
a user specified value.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists