linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 37/59] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Move kvm_vgic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 26 Aug 2017 21:49:00 +0200
From:   Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shameerali Kolothum Thodi 
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 37/59] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Move kvm_vgic_destroy
 call around

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 06:26:15PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The way we call kvm_vgic_destroy is a bit bizarre. We call it
> *after* having freed the vcpus, which sort of defeats the point
> of cleaning up things before that point.
> 
> Let's move kvm_vgic_destroy towards the beginning of kvm_arch_destroy_vm,
> which seems more sensible.
> 

Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>

> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 7846a578db1a..ebab6c29e3be 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +	kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
> +
>  	free_percpu(kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran);
>  	kvm->arch.last_vcpu_ran = NULL;
>  
> @@ -186,8 +188,6 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  			kvm->vcpus[i] = NULL;
>  		}
>  	}
> -
> -	kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> -- 
> 2.11.0
>