[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170827032745.GC13622@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 05:27:45 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Roc He <hepeng@...oo.tv>,
????????? <jiang.liqin@...iatech.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] rtc: Add Realtek RTD1295
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:30:08AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 27.08.2017 um 04:05 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> > n Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 02:33:27AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> +struct rtd119x_rtc {
> >> + void __iomem *base;
> >> + struct clk *clk;
> >> + struct rtc_device *rtcdev;
> >> + unsigned base_year;
> >> + spinlock_t lock;
> >
> > Where is this lock initialised? I would expect a call to
> > spin_lock_init() somewhere.
>
> Hm, the spinlock in my irq mux series doesn't have that call either; my
> reset driver did have it. The zero initialization appears to work OK,
> but you're probably right that it should be there.
Hi Andreas
I suspect you will have problems if you enable spin lock debug code,
like CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists