linux-kernel - Re: [patch v1 0/2] JTAG driver introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170828200305.GA5132@amd>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:03:05 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Oleksandr Shamray <oleksandrs@...lanox.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        system-sw-low-level <system-sw-low-level@...lanox.com>,
        "openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mec@...ut.net" <mec@...ut.net>, "joel@....id.au" <joel@....id.au>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vadimp@...llanox.com" <vadimp@...llanox.com>,
        "tklauser@...tanz.ch" <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v1 0/2] JTAG driver introduction

Hi!

> > Thanks a lot for review.
> > 
> 
> > We used user space tool for that, which is an adaptation of some
> > Lattice tools, which allows programming of SVF files. We are using
> > it for Lattice CPLD burning, since we have for such devices on our
> > system, but this tool could be used for programming other devices
> > from other vendors as well.
>  
> > https://github.com/mellanoxbmc/mellanox-bmc-tools
> 
> Since you are defining a new Kernel ABI here, it would be good to get
> some buy-in from potential users for the ABI. Maybe for the next
> version of the patchset you can cross post to the OpenOCD-devel list?

Actually, since you are defining a new ABI, it would be nice to have a
Documentation/ file with the ABI description, so that people can
review it...

Otherwise... yes, this looks like a step in right direction from 60000
feet above. I guess it is still a lot of work to get gdb running...

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)