lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170828212151.dawlnvvxhkkcmqo3@pd.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:21:52 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_platform_list()

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:55:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So what about the [3-5/5] in this series?
> 
> My current plan is to apply them too and expose a branch with them, can I
> go ahead with that?

No, please expose a branch with only the ACPI patches, i.e., 1 and 2 and
I can merge it and apply the EDAC patches ontop.

Then you and I need to sync up so that you send your pull requests first
and I follow you so that Linus applies them in the proper order.

Makes sense?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ