linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PM: docs: Describe high-level PM strategies and sleep states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:16:23 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PM: docs: Describe high-level PM strategies and sleep states

On Monday, August 21, 2017 3:14:56 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Reorganize the power management part of admin-guide by adding a
> description of major power management strategies supported by the
> kernel (system-wide and working-state power management) to it and
> dividing the rest of the material into the system-wide PM and
> working-state PM chapters.
> 
> On top of that, add a description of system sleep states to the
> system-wide PM chapter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
> ---
> 
> -> v2:
>  - Changed the wording in the strategies.rst document slightly
>    to address Lukas' comments.
>  - Changed refs in the sleep-states.rst document to address
>    Markus' comments.
>  - Followed Markus' suggestion to drop C&P 'only' blocks in a few
>    places.
>  - Added Reviewed-by from Lukas as the changes to the content are
>    very small.
> 

I haven't seen any more comments on this which I'm taking as the lack of
objections, so I'm going to queue it up for 4.14.

Thanks,
Rafael