The error and the spurious interrupt are really rare events and not at all so performance sensitive that two NOP5s can not be tolerated when tracing is disabled. Remove the nonsense. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 4 +-- arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 43 +++++++++--------------------------------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h @@ -48,15 +48,15 @@ extern asmlinkage void call_function_sin #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING /* Interrupt handlers registered during init_IRQ */ -extern void trace_error_interrupt(void); extern void trace_irq_work_interrupt(void); -extern void trace_spurious_interrupt(void); extern void trace_thermal_interrupt(void); extern void trace_reschedule_interrupt(void); extern void trace_threshold_interrupt(void); extern void trace_deferred_error_interrupt(void); extern void trace_call_function_interrupt(void); extern void trace_call_function_single_interrupt(void); +#define trace_error_interrupt error_interrupt +#define trace_spurious_interrupt spurious_interrupt #define trace_x86_platform_ipi x86_platform_ipi #define trace_apic_timer_interrupt apic_timer_interrupt #define trace_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt irq_move_cleanup_interrupt --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c @@ -1899,10 +1899,14 @@ void __init register_lapic_address(unsig /* * This interrupt should _never_ happen with our APIC/SMP architecture */ -static void __smp_spurious_interrupt(u8 vector) +__visible void __irq_entry smp_spurious_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs) { + u8 vector = ~regs->orig_ax; u32 v; + entering_irq(); + trace_spurious_apic_entry(vector); + /* * Check if this really is a spurious interrupt and ACK it * if it is a vectored one. Just in case... @@ -1917,22 +1921,7 @@ static void __smp_spurious_interrupt(u8 /* see sw-dev-man vol 3, chapter 7.4.13.5 */ pr_info("spurious APIC interrupt through vector %02x on CPU#%d, " "should never happen.\n", vector, smp_processor_id()); -} -__visible void __irq_entry smp_spurious_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - entering_irq(); - __smp_spurious_interrupt(~regs->orig_ax); - exiting_irq(); -} - -__visible void __irq_entry smp_trace_spurious_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - u8 vector = ~regs->orig_ax; - - entering_irq(); - trace_spurious_apic_entry(vector); - __smp_spurious_interrupt(vector); trace_spurious_apic_exit(vector); exiting_irq(); } @@ -1940,10 +1929,8 @@ static void __smp_spurious_interrupt(u8 /* * This interrupt should never happen with our APIC/SMP architecture */ -static void __smp_error_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs) +__visible void __irq_entry smp_error_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs) { - u32 v; - u32 i = 0; static const char * const error_interrupt_reason[] = { "Send CS error", /* APIC Error Bit 0 */ "Receive CS error", /* APIC Error Bit 1 */ @@ -1954,6 +1941,10 @@ static void __smp_error_interrupt(struct "Received illegal vector", /* APIC Error Bit 6 */ "Illegal register address", /* APIC Error Bit 7 */ }; + u32 v, i = 0; + + entering_irq(); + trace_error_apic_entry(ERROR_APIC_VECTOR); /* First tickle the hardware, only then report what went on. -- REW */ if (lapic_get_maxlvt() > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */ @@ -1975,20 +1966,6 @@ static void __smp_error_interrupt(struct apic_printk(APIC_DEBUG, KERN_CONT "\n"); -} - -__visible void __irq_entry smp_error_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - entering_irq(); - __smp_error_interrupt(regs); - exiting_irq(); -} - -__visible void __irq_entry smp_trace_error_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs) -{ - entering_irq(); - trace_error_apic_entry(ERROR_APIC_VECTOR); - __smp_error_interrupt(regs); trace_error_apic_exit(ERROR_APIC_VECTOR); exiting_irq(); }