linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170828123238.410885a1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:32:38 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

Hi Dave,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/imx/ipuv3-plane.c

between commit:

  5be5dd38d462 ("drm/imx: ipuv3-plane: fix YUV framebuffer scanout on the base plane")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  58dff39904c0 ("drm/imx: ipuv3-plane: use fb local variable instead of state->fb")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (the former included the latter change) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell