linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 10/84] ptr_ring: use kmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170828080529.927560102@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:04:35 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 10/84] ptr_ring: use kmalloc_array()

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>


[ Upstream commit 81fbfe8adaf38d4f5a98c19bebfd41c5d6acaee8 ]

As found by syzkaller, malicious users can set whatever tx_queue_len
on a tun device and eventually crash the kernel.

Lets remove the ALIGN(XXX, SMP_CACHE_BYTES) thing since a small
ring buffer is not fast anyway.

Fixes: 2e0ab8ca83c1 ("ptr_ring: array based FIFO for pointers")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/linux/ptr_ring.h  |    9 +++++----
 include/linux/skb_array.h |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
@@ -340,9 +340,9 @@ static inline void *ptr_ring_consume_bh(
 	__PTR_RING_PEEK_CALL_v; \
 })
 
-static inline void **__ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc(int size, gfp_t gfp)
+static inline void **__ptr_ring_init_queue_alloc(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-	return kzalloc(ALIGN(size * sizeof(void *), SMP_CACHE_BYTES), gfp);
+	return kcalloc(size, sizeof(void *), gfp);
 }
 
 static inline int ptr_ring_init(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp)
@@ -417,7 +417,8 @@ static inline int ptr_ring_resize(struct
  * In particular if you consume ring in interrupt or BH context, you must
  * disable interrupts/BH when doing so.
  */
-static inline int ptr_ring_resize_multiple(struct ptr_ring **rings, int nrings,
+static inline int ptr_ring_resize_multiple(struct ptr_ring **rings,
+					   unsigned int nrings,
 					   int size,
 					   gfp_t gfp, void (*destroy)(void *))
 {
@@ -425,7 +426,7 @@ static inline int ptr_ring_resize_multip
 	void ***queues;
 	int i;
 
-	queues = kmalloc(nrings * sizeof *queues, gfp);
+	queues = kmalloc_array(nrings, sizeof(*queues), gfp);
 	if (!queues)
 		goto noqueues;
 
--- a/include/linux/skb_array.h
+++ b/include/linux/skb_array.h
@@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ static inline int skb_array_resize(struc
 }
 
 static inline int skb_array_resize_multiple(struct skb_array **rings,
-					    int nrings, int size, gfp_t gfp)
+					    int nrings, unsigned int size,
+					    gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct skb_array, ring));
 	return ptr_ring_resize_multiple((struct ptr_ring **)rings,