lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fe9e409-b505-f9af-63b7-02e91918db9d@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:27:20 +0200
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Geetha Sowjanya <geethasowjanya.akula@...ium.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/IORT: fix build regression without IOMMU

On 10.08.2017 16:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 02:11:00PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> A recent change reintroduced a bug that had previously been
>> fixed by commit d49f2dedf33b ("ACPI/IORT: Fix CONFIG_IOMMU_API
>> dependency"):
>>
>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c: In function 'iort_iommu_configure':
>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:829:26: error: 'struct iommu_fwspec' has no member named 'ops'
>>
>> This does the same change again, replacing another direct
>> reference to iommu_fwspec->ops with a helper function call.
>>
>> Fixes: bc8648d49a95 ("ACPI/IORT: Handle PCI aliases properly for IOMMUs")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Sorry Arnd, thanks, I will send it to Catalin straight away.

Was there any progress? Afaics that patch hasn't hit mainline yet (or
was it fixed by a different patch?). Asking because the issue is
mentioned in the regression report for 4.13.

Ciao, Thorsten


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ