linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] spmi: pmic-arb: Enforce the ownership check optionally

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:53:28 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     sboyd@...eaurora.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
        David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] spmi: pmic-arb: Enforce the ownership check optionally

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 08:58:29PM +0530, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> The peripheral ownership check is not necessary on single master
> platforms. Hence, enforce the peripheral ownership check optionally.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
> ---
> v2:
> 	Fixed the commit message.
> 	Added Shawn's 'Tested-by' tag.
> 
> v1:
> 	This patch depends on the below patch series. Please take this patch
> 	along with this series.
> 
> 	[PATCH V2 00/12]: spmi: pmic-arb: Support for HW v5 and other fixes
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb.txt | 6 ++++++
>  drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c                                  | 7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

This doesn't apply on top of the other spmi patches I just added to my
tree.  Did I mess something up here?

thanks,

greg k-h