[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170828115328.GA26757@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:53:28 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
Cc: sboyd@...eaurora.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] spmi: pmic-arb: Enforce the ownership check optionally
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 08:58:29PM +0530, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> The peripheral ownership check is not necessary on single master
> platforms. Hence, enforce the peripheral ownership check optionally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <kgunda@...eaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
> ---
> v2:
> Fixed the commit message.
> Added Shawn's 'Tested-by' tag.
>
> v1:
> This patch depends on the below patch series. Please take this patch
> along with this series.
>
> [PATCH V2 00/12]: spmi: pmic-arb: Support for HW v5 and other fixes
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/qcom,spmi-pmic-arb.txt | 6 ++++++
> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 7 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This doesn't apply on top of the other spmi patches I just added to my
tree. Did I mess something up here?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists