linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170828152016.635096c0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:20:16 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got conflicts in:

  arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S
  arch/x86/xen/xen-asm_64.S

between commit:

  edcb5cf84f05 ("x86/paravirt/xen: Remove xen_patch()")

from the tip tree and commits:

  ad5b8c4ba323("xen: get rid of paravirt op adjust_exception_frame")
  bd830917233b ("paravirt,xen: remove xen_patch()")

from the xen-tip tree.

I fixed it up (edcb5cf84f05 and bd830917233b ate more or less the same
patch, so I just used the latter version files) and can carry the fix
as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell