linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 v10] time: Make fast functions return 0 before timekeeping is initialized

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708281658370.1867@nanos>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:00:59 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v10] time: Make fast functions return 0 before
 timekeeping is initialized

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> +static struct tk_fast tk_fast_mono ____cacheline_aligned = {
> +	.base = {
> +		(struct tk_read_base){
> +			.clock = &dummy_clock,
> +		},
> +		(struct tk_read_base){
> +			.clock = &dummy_clock,
> +		},
> +	},
> +};

I think I complained about this ugly typecast before.

  	.base[0] = { .clock = &dummy_clock, },
       	.base[1] = { .clock = &dummy_clock, },

Hmm?

Thanks,

	tglx