[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170828155506.GA531@zzz.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:55:06 -0500
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fork: fix incorrect fput of ->exe_file causing
use-after-free
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:40:36PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/24, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:20:41PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > On 08/23, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > > >
> > > > Commit 7c051267931a ("mm, fork: make dup_mmap wait for mmap_sem for
> > > > write killable") made it possible to kill a forking task while it is
> > > > waiting to acquire its ->mmap_sem for write, in dup_mmap(). However, it
> > > > was overlooked that this introduced an new error path before a reference
> > > > is taken on the mm_struct's ->exe_file.
> > >
> > > Hmm. Unless I am totally confused, the same problem with mm->exol_area?
> > > I'll recheck....
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean by ->exol_area.
>
> I meant mm->uprobes_state.xol_area, sorry
>
Yep, that's a bug too. I was able to cause a use-after-free using the same
reproducer program I gave in my commit message, after setting a uprobe
tracepoint on the beginning of the fork_thread() function. I'll send a patch to
fix it when I have a chance.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists