[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170828160227.awm3bnz23gecwk6j@ninjato>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:02:27 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 01/16] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: Document
vendor to be used and deprecated ones
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 08:54:03PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The at24 driver allows to register I2C EEPROM chips using different vendor
> and devices, but the I2C subsystem does not take the vendor into account
> when matching using the I2C table since it only has device entries.
>
> But when matching using an OF table, both the vendor and device has to be
> taken into account so the driver defines only a set of compatible strings
> using the "atmel" vendor as a generic fallback for compatible I2C devices.
>
> Document in the Device Tree binding document that this manufacturer should
> be used as the generic fallback. Also document the deprecated vendors.
>
> Suggested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
>
Applied to for-next, thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists