linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] igb: check memory allocation failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:12:30 +0200
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To:     "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter" <peter.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
        "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:     "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: check memory allocation failure

Le 28/08/2017 à 01:09, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter a écrit :
> On 8/27/17 2:42 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> Check memory allocation failures and return -ENOMEM in such cases, as
>> already done for other memory allocations in this function.
>>
>> This avoids NULL pointers dereference.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>> ---
>>    drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 ++
>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> index fd4a46b03cc8..837d9b46a390 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
>> @@ -3162,6 +3162,8 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>>    	/* Setup and initialize a copy of the hw vlan table array */
>>    	adapter->shadow_vfta = kcalloc(E1000_VLAN_FILTER_TBL_SIZE, sizeof(u32),
>>    				       GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +	if (!adapter->shadow_vfta)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
> Looks reasonable to me.
>
> A larger issue though I see in this function is that if we return
> -ENOMEM here, and if we return -ENOMEM from igb_init_interrupt_scheme()
> below on failure, we leak adapter->mac_table (and adapter->shadow_vfta
> in the latter).  We should add a proper unwind to free up the memory on
> failure.
>
> -PJ
>
Hi,

in fact, there is no leak because the only caller of 'igb_sw_init()' 
(i.e. 'igb_probe()'), already frees these resources in case of error, 
see [1]

These resources are also freed  in 'igb_remove()'.

Best reagrds,
CJ

[1]: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c#n2775