[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALcN6mjaS+OWiD4JcYMxs=crSMSLxbtB7c+TLT8UBuRDOUKdZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:31:34 -0700
From: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] perf tools: Minor build fixes
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:34:21AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 12:54:36AM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
>> > Collection of minor fixes to compile with LLVM and
>> > non-standard tool names.
>> >
>> > David Carrillo-Cisneros (6):
>> > tools build tests: Don't hardcode gcc name
>> > perf tools: Allow external definition of flex and bison binary names
>> > tools lib: Allow external definition of CC, AR and LD
>> > perf tools: Robustify detection of clang binary
>> > perf tools: Remove BUG_ON char[] to bool implicit conversions
>> > perf tools: Pass full path of FEATURES_DUMP
>>
>> apart from comment for 5/6 I'm ok with this
>>
>> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks, applied all that Jiri acked, agree with him that BUG should be
> avoided, and also that we should use existing facilities when available,
> and when there aren't, try to replicate as best as we can similar
> facilities existing in the kernel source code.
Thank you for applying them. I sent a new version of the one commented by Jiri.
David
>
> - Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists