lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170829163513.4b119a91@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:35:13 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the parisc-hd tree

Hi Greg,

Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_gsc.c

between commit:

  9e466f101e19 ("parisc/8250_gsc: Fix section mismatches")

from the parisc-hd tree and commit:

  0d474f7fad3b ("tty: 8250: constify parisc_device_id")

from the tty tree.

I fixed it up (the former is a superset of the latter) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ