[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEU1=PmgWSi7hrLpQ2nQUi_Ki5Z6JsJMi-fV5ke1B26aC0kqSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:11:15 +0530
From: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Andres Oportus <andresoportus@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] sched/fair: add util_est on top of PELT
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Patrick Bellasi
<patrick.bellasi@....com> wrote:
> The util_avg signal computed by PELT is too variable for some use-cases.
> For example, a big task waking up after a long sleep period will have its
> utilization almost completely decayed. This introduces some latency before
> schedutil will be able to pick the best frequency to run a task.
>
<snip>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index c28b182c9833..8d7bc55f68d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/signal_types.h>
> #include <linux/mm_types_task.h>
> #include <linux/task_io_accounting.h>
> +#include <linux/average.h>
>
> /* task_struct member predeclarations (sorted alphabetically): */
> struct audit_context;
> @@ -277,6 +278,16 @@ struct load_weight {
> u32 inv_weight;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * Utilizaton's Exponential Weighted Moving Average (EWMA)
> + *
> + * Support functions to track an EWMA for the utilization of SEs and RQs. New
> + * samples will be added to the moving average each time a task completes an
> + * activation. Thus the weight is chosen so that the EWMA wil be relatively
> + * insensitive to transient changes to the task's workload.
> + */
> +DECLARE_EWMA(util, 0, 4);
> +
> /*
Should the factor be 1 instead of 0? i.e 25% contribution from the
recent sample.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists