linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] input: Add MediaTek PMIC keys support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:40:59 +0800
From:   Chen Zhong <chen.zhong@...iatek.com>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
CC:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        "Javier Martinez Canillas" <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@...sung.com>,
        <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] input: Add MediaTek PMIC keys support

Hi Andi,

Sorry for that, i deleted some prefix since the namings will be such
long. If this should be consistent, I'll check and modify them in the
next version.

Thank you.

On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 16:34 +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Chen,
> 
> what I would ask you is to be consistent with the naming, if your
> driver is called mtk-pmic, then all your functions and global
> variables should be named accordingly as mtk_pmic or MTK_PMIC.
> Please check in between the lines for real examples:
> 
> > +#define PWRKEY_RST_EN_MASK	0x1
> > +#define PWRKEY_RST_EN_SHIFT	6
> > +#define HOMEKEY_RST_EN_MASK	0x1
> > +#define HOMEKEY_RST_EN_SHIFT	5
> > +#define RST_DU_MASK		0x3
> > +#define RST_DU_SHIFT		8
> > +
> > +#define PMIC_PWRKEY_INDEX	0
> > +#define PMIC_HOMEKEY_INDEX	1
> > +#define PMIC_MAX_KEY_COUNT	2
> 
> #define MTK_PMIC_*
> 
> > +struct pmic_keys_regs {
> 
> struct mtk_pmic_keys_regs
> 
> > +	u32 deb_reg;
> > +	u32 deb_mask;
> > +	u32 intsel_reg;
> > +	u32 intsel_mask;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define PMIC_KEYS_REGS(_deb_reg, _deb_mask, _intsel_reg, _intsel_mask)	\
> 
> MTK_PMIC_KEYS_REGS
> 
> > +{									\
> > +	.deb_reg		= _deb_reg,				\
> > +	.deb_mask		= _deb_mask,				\
> > +	.intsel_reg		= _intsel_reg,				\
> > +	.intsel_mask		= _intsel_mask,				\
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct pmic_regs {
> 
> mtk_pmic_regs
> 
> and so on... you got the point.
> 
> Andi