linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/84] 4.9.46-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAO_48GFeL7f2kv+X2uz9jE7=PxLNbk5358FmRaKy-BJ30-0cTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:32:16 +0530
From:   Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/84] 4.9.46-stable review

Hi Greg,

On 28 August 2017 at 13:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.46 release.
> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Aug 30 08:05:10 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

For ARM64, built and boot-tested with defconfig on hikey; no regressions noted.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.46-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Best,
Sumit.