linux-kernel - Re: locking/spinlock/debug: Remove spinlock lockup detection code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUuM671eXr38bKnfNu_=oN5q1g=qsCaSvQv1zsTNPqQkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:07:08 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ltsi-dev@...ts.linuxfoundation.org" 
        <ltsi-dev@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: locking/spinlock/debug: Remove spinlock lockup detection code

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> wrote:
> Web:        https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/bc88c10d7e6900916f5e1ba3829d66a9de92b633
> Commit:     bc88c10d7e6900916f5e1ba3829d66a9de92b633
> Parent:     f9af456a61ecfbef8233c5046a9e347c9b98ba05
> Refname:    refs/heads/master
> Author:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> AuthorDate: Wed Feb 8 14:46:48 2017 -0500
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Fri Feb 10 09:09:49 2017 +0100
>
>     locking/spinlock/debug: Remove spinlock lockup detection code
>
>     The current spinlock lockup detection code can sometimes produce false
>     positives because of the unfairness of the locking algorithm itself.
>
>     So the lockup detection code is now removed. Instead, we are relying
>     on the NMI watchdog to detect potential lockup. We won't have lockup
>     detection if the watchdog isn't running.
>
>     The commented-out read-write lock lockup detection code are also
>     removed.
>
>     Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>     Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>     Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>     Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>     Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>     Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
>     Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>     Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486583208-11038-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com
>     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

Can you please backport this commit to v4.9.x and/or ltsi?

It fixes the following issue in 4.9.40-ltsi on r8a7740/armadillo:

    BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, swapper/1
     lock: lcdc0_device+0xa0/0x258, .magic: 00000000, .owner:
<none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
    CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted
4.9.40-ltsi-armadillo-00939-gfc8b396897fd0712 #36
    Hardware name: Generic R8A7740 (Flattened Device Tree)
    [<c010d068>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010ab54>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
    [<c010ab54>] (show_stack) from [<c014fe9c>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0xd4/0x118)
    [<c014fe9c>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c0357000>]
(dev_pm_get_subsys_data+0x2c/0x9c)
    [<c0357000>] (dev_pm_get_subsys_data) from [<c0360978>]
(genpd_add_device+0x38/0x1b4)
    [<c0360978>] (genpd_add_device) from [<c0360b74>]
(of_genpd_add_device+0x38/0x50)
    [<c0360b74>] (of_genpd_add_device) from [<c0818ef8>]
(board_staging_register_device+0xb0/0xe8)
    [<c0818ef8>] (board_staging_register_device) from [<c0818f54>]
(board_staging_register_devices+0x24/0x2c)
    [<c0818f54>] (board_staging_register_devices) from [<c0818f88>]
(runtime_board_check+0x2c/0x40)
    [<c0818f88>] (runtime_board_check) from [<c01016dc>]
(do_one_initcall+0xac/0x154)
    [<c01016dc>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c0800ce8>]
(kernel_init_freeable+0x104/0x1c4)
    [<c0800ce8>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c0522150>]
(kernel_init+0x8/0x10c)
    [<c0522150>] (kernel_init) from [<c0106db0>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds