[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170829135517.GA30733@ulmo>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:55:17 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:09:00PM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
>
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> index 9c40da5..90cda5b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c
> @@ -1156,10 +1156,7 @@ static int tegra_pcie_resets_get(struct tegra_pcie *pcie)
> return PTR_ERR(pcie->afi_rst);
>
> pcie->pcie_xrst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pcie_x");
> - if (IS_ERR(pcie->pcie_xrst))
> - return PTR_ERR(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> -
> - return 0;
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pcie->pcie_xrst);
> }
I'm not a big fan of this construct because it's a pain to undo this if
ever we need to add code to this function. But since we do have scripts
that will flag this, I guess this would pop up every now and again. The
driver is unlikely to change in this part, too, so:
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists