[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170829171121.cxjwrzhbotdkddec@rob-hp-laptop>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:11:21 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ravikumar Kattekola <rk@...com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: sdhci-omap: Add bindings for the
sdhci-omap controller
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:12:46AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Add binding for the TI's sdhci-omap controller. This now includes only
> a subset of properties documented in ti-omap-hsmmc.txt but will eventually
> include all the properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> ---
> Changes from v2:
> *) Fixed example to use the updated compatible
>
> Changes from v1:
> *) Create a new sdhci-omap.txt document for TI's sdhci-omap controller instead
> of using the ti-omap-hsmmc.txt as suggested by Tony
> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-omap.txt | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-omap.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-omap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-omap.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..139695ad2d58
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-omap.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +* TI OMAP SDHCI Controller
> +
> +Refer to mmc.txt for standard MMC bindings.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: Should be "ti,dra7-sdhci" for DRA7 and DRA72 controllers
> +- ti,hwmods: Must be "mmc<n>", <n> is controller instance starting 1
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- ti,dual-volt: boolean, supports dual voltage cards
> +- ti,non-removable: non-removable slot (like eMMC)
Well, if you are doing a new compatible, then why aren't you using
common properties?
> +
> +Example:
> + mmc1: mmc@...809c000 {
Drop the '0x'.
> + compatible = "ti,dra7-sdhci";
> + reg = <0x4809c000 0x400>;
> + ti,hwmods = "mmc1";
> + ti,dual-volt;
> + bus-width = <4>;
> + vmmc-supply = <&vmmc>; /* phandle to regulator node */
> + ti,non-removable;
> + };
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists