[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEU1=PnypZ7V5yL6K3fT_OpfTosK15ju0vcztk8NpDj9xVu4xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 10:06:44 +0530
From: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Andres Oportus <andresoportus@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] sched/fair: add util_est on top of PELT
Hi Patrick,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Patrick Bellasi
<patrick.bellasi@....com> wrote:
> The util_avg signal computed by PELT is too variable for some use-cases.
> For example, a big task waking up after a long sleep period will have its
> utilization almost completely decayed. This introduces some latency before
> schedutil will be able to pick the best frequency to run a task.
>
> The same issue can affect task placement. Indeed, since the task
> utilization is already decayed at wakeup, when the task is enqueued in a
> CPU, this can results in a CPU running a big task as being temporarily
> represented as being almost empty. This leads to a race condition where
> other tasks can be potentially allocated on a CPU which just started to run
> a big task which slept for a relatively long period.
>
> Moreover, the utilization of a task is, by PELT definition, a continuously
> changing metrics. This contributes in making almost instantly outdated some
> decisions based on the value of the PELT's utilization.
>
> For all these reasons, a more stable signal could probably do a better job
> of representing the expected/estimated utilization of a SE/RQ. Such a
> signal can be easily created on top of PELT by still using it as an
> estimator which produces values to be aggregated once meaningful events
> happens.
>
> This patch adds a simple implementation of util_est, a new signal built on
> top of PELT's util_avg where:
>
> util_est(se) = max(se::util_avg, f(se::util_avg@...ueue_times))
>
I don't see any wrapper function in this patch that implements this
signal. You want to use this signal in the task placement path as a
replacement of task_util(), right?
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists