[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170829203434.6826-1-dbasehore@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 13:34:34 -0700
From: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, jingoohan1@...il.com,
lee.jones@...aro.org, briannorris@...omium.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] pwm_bl: Fix overflow condition
This fixes an overflow condition that can happen with high max
brightness and period values in compute_duty_cycle. This fixes it by
using a 64 bit variable for computing the duty cycle.
Signed-off-by: Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
---
drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index 76311ec5e400..5ccc8e34b7a6 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
@@ -88,14 +88,17 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(struct pwm_bl_data *pb)
static int compute_duty_cycle(struct pwm_bl_data *pb, int brightness)
{
unsigned int lth = pb->lth_brightness;
- int duty_cycle;
+ u64 duty_cycle;
if (pb->levels)
duty_cycle = pb->levels[brightness];
else
duty_cycle = brightness;
- return (duty_cycle * (pb->period - lth) / pb->scale) + lth;
+ duty_cycle *= pb->period - lth;
+ do_div(duty_cycle, pb->scale);
+
+ return duty_cycle + lth;
}
static int pwm_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
--
2.14.1.342.g6490525c54-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists