linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: allwinner: h5: add support for NanoPi NEO Plus 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170829215112.4p34hryd7kmhhr6w@AntonyAntony.local>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2017 23:51:12 +0200
From:   Antony Antony <antony@...nome.org>
To:     Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
Cc:     Code Kipper <codekipper@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: allwinner: h5: add support for NanoPi NEO Plus
 2


On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 08:18:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 
> 
> 于 2017年8月28日 GMT+08:00 下午8:16:44, Antony Antony <antony@...nome.org> 写到:
> >On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 03:28:41PM +0200, Code Kipper wrote:
> >> On 25 August 2017 at 12:32, Antony Antony <antony@...nome.org> wrote:
> >
> >> > +
> >> > +       brcmf: bcrmf@1 {
> >> > +               reg = <1>;
> >> > +               compatible = "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
> >> > +       };
> >> Incorrect wifi chip - just deliver what you've tested.
> 
> Nope, this compatible is required by the dt binding, see the
> binding document or other DTs with brcmfmac SDIO.

Icenowy,

Thanks for pointing out brcm,bcm43430-fmac is missing in Documenation.
I just send a patch to wireless brcmfmac maintainers. 

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9928387/

Would this work?

> Please complain to brcmfmac maintainers.

Lets see how it shakes out. 

regards,
-antony