[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170830010348.GB654@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:03:48 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: printk: what is going on with additional newlines?
Hello,
On (08/29/17 19:50), Steven Rostedt wrote:
[..]
> > A private buffer has none of those issues.
>
> What about using the seq_buf*() then?
>
> struct seq_buf s;
>
> buf = kmalloc(mysize);
> seq_buf_init(&s, buf, mysize);
>
> seq_printf(&s,"blah blah %d", bah_blah);
> [...]
> seq_printf(&s, "my last print\n");
>
> printk("%.*s", s.len, s.buffer);
>
> kfree(buf);
could do. for a single continuation line printk("%.*s", s.len, s.buffer)
this will work perfectly fine. for a more general case - backtraces, dumps,
etc. - this requires some tweaks.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists