linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 43/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Unmap VLPI when freeing an LPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c02319d5-cd05-634f-60ce-e4570ebed770@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:03:51 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:     Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shameerali Kolothum Thodi 
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 43/59] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Unmap VLPI when freeing
 an LPI

On 28/08/17 19:18, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 06:26:21PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> When freeing an LPI (on a DISCARD command, for example), we need
>> to unmap the VLPI down to the physical ITS level.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 6 +++++-
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> index 40aeadef33fe..79bac93d3e7d 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> @@ -623,8 +623,12 @@ static void its_free_ite(struct kvm *kvm, struct its_ite *ite)
>>  	list_del(&ite->ite_list);
>>  
>>  	/* This put matches the get in vgic_add_lpi. */
>> -	if (ite->irq)
>> +	if (ite->irq) {
>> +		if (ite->irq->hw)
>> +			its_unmap_vlpi(ite->irq->host_irq);
> 
> nit: should we raise a warning on a bad return value?

I guess we could. Getting an error here is am indication that something
has gone wrong...

> Otherwise:
> 
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...