[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170830124459.GA10438@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:44:59 +0100
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: use per-cpu stocks for socket memory
uncharging
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 02:36:55PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 29-08-17 11:01:50, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index b9cf3cf4a3d0..a69d23082abf 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -1792,6 +1792,9 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
> > }
> > stock->nr_pages += nr_pages;
> >
> > + if (stock->nr_pages > CHARGE_BATCH)
> > + drain_stock(stock);
> > +
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > }
>
> Why do we need this? In other words, why cannot we rely on draining we
> already do?
The existing draining depends on memory pressure, so to keep
the accounting (which we expose to a user) reasonable accurate
even without memory pressure, we need to limit the size of per-cpu stocks.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists