[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170830015134.GD654@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 10:51:34 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: printk: what is going on with additional newlines?
On (08/29/17 21:10), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On (08/29/17 19:50), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > A private buffer has none of those issues.
> > >
> > > What about using the seq_buf*() then?
> > >
> > > struct seq_buf s;
> > >
> > > buf = kmalloc(mysize);
> > > seq_buf_init(&s, buf, mysize);
> > >
> > > seq_printf(&s,"blah blah %d", bah_blah);
> > > [...]
> > > seq_printf(&s, "my last print\n");
> > >
> > > printk("%.*s", s.len, s.buffer);
> > >
> > > kfree(buf);
> >
> > could do. for a single continuation line printk("%.*s", s.len, s.buffer)
> > this will work perfectly fine. for a more general case - backtraces, dumps,
> > etc. - this requires some tweaks.
>
> We could simply add a seq_buf_printk() that is implemented in the printk
> proper, to parse the seq_buf buffer properly, and add the timestamps and
> such.
sounds like a plan :)
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists