linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acpi: apei: call into AER handling regardless of severity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170830151601.ro5qt5272e2msevp@pd.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:16:01 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        lenb@...nel.org, will.deacon@....com, james.morse@....com,
        prarit@...hat.com, punit.agrawal@....com, shiju.jose@...wei.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: apei: call into AER handling regardless of severity

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:05:44AM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Link reset is not the only recovery mechanism. In the case of nonfatal
> errors, it is assumed that the endpoint CSR is still reachable.
> Error is propagated the PCIe endpoint driver. Endpoint driver does a
> re-initialization, we are back in business.

I'm assuming that's broadcast_error_message()'s job.

> That's not true. The GHES code is changing the severity here before posting
> to the AER driver in ghes_do_proc().
> 
> 	if (gdata->flags & CPER_SEC_RESET)
> 		aer_severity = AER_FATAL;

You're missing the point that we would walk into that if branch *only* for

                        if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
                            sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE

severities. So if you have an AER_FATAL error but ghes severities are
not GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE, nothing happens.

> No, AER ISR is not set up if firmware first is enabled.

So then this is a major suckage. We do AER recovery on FF systems only
for GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE severity.

> The behavior should match non firmware-first case ideally.
> 
> 1. Print all correctable errors.
> 2. Go to do_recovery for all uncorrectable errors including fatal and
> non-fatal. 
> 
> This is also what AER driver does in the absence of firmware first via
> handle_error_source().

Yes, that makes sense.

Which would mean that we'd call aer_recover_queue() regardless of GHES
severity but we'd do recovery only if GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE is set
or CPER_SEC_RESET. I.e., we can communicate all that by setting the
correct AER severity before calling aer_recover_queue(). And then call
do_recovery() based on AER severity.

Hmmm?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--