lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:13:02 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Arnav Dawn <a.dawn@...sung.com>,
        Guan Junxiong <guanjunxiong@...wei.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>,
        Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@...zon.de>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
        Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
        Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@...bit.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the block
        tree

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 03:38:03AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the
> > "patch's delivery path" and so should add a Signed-off-by tag.  
> 
> Yeah, I agree. Rebasing really is pretty much the exact same thing as
> applying a patch."

Ok, we'll get it right next time.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists