lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:13:02 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <>, Jens Axboe <>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Sagi Grimberg <>,
        Arnav Dawn <>,
        Guan Junxiong <>,
        Max Gurtovoy <>,
        James Smart <>,
        Martin Wilck <>,
        Jan H. Schönherr <>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
        Philipp Reisner <>,
        Lars Ellenberg <>,
        Roland Kammerer <>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the block

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 03:38:03AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the
> > "patch's delivery path" and so should add a Signed-off-by tag.  
> Yeah, I agree. Rebasing really is pretty much the exact same thing as
> applying a patch."

Ok, we'll get it right next time.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists