linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170830181302.GA5734@lst.de>
Date:   Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:13:02 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Arnav Dawn <a.dawn@...sung.com>,
        Guan Junxiong <guanjunxiong@...wei.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>,
        Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@...zon.de>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>,
        Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
        Roland Kammerer <roland.kammerer@...bit.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the block
        tree

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 03:38:03AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the
> > "patch's delivery path" and so should add a Signed-off-by tag.  
> 
> Yeah, I agree. Rebasing really is pretty much the exact same thing as
> applying a patch."

Ok, we'll get it right next time.