[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY4PR21MB0182CFFD8C7F455140DC69B2CE9D0@CY4PR21MB0182.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 02:28:21 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] storvsc: fix memory leak on ring buffer busy
> Long,
>
> >> Which kernel version is this patch aimed at?
> >
> > Martin, thanks for pointing this out. This should also go to stable
> > trees.
>
> The reason I asked is that it didn't apply to neither fixes, nor for-next.
>
> I applied it to 4.13/scsi-fixes by hand and added a stable tag.
Thank you. I'm sorry I misunderstood your question. I just realized I was working on an experimental branch. Sorry about that.
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists