[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170831093146.GA15031@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:31:47 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Victor Chibotaru <tchibo@...gle.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kcov: support comparison operands collection
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:08:43PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >> From: Victor Chibotaru <tchibo@...gle.com>
> >>
> >> Enables kcov to collect comparison operands from instrumented code.
> >> This is done by using Clang's -fsanitize=trace-cmp instrumentation
> >> (currently not available for GCC).
> >> Clang instrumentation:
> >> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html#tracing-data-flow
> >
> > How stable is this?
> >
> > The comment at the end says "This interface is a subject to change."
>
> The intention is that this is not subject to change anymore (since we
> are using it in kernel).
> I've mailed change to docs: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37303
Ok; thanks for confirming.
> FWIW, there is patch in flight that adds this instrumentation to gcc:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/syzkaller/CSLynn6nI-A
> It seems to be stalled on review phase, though.
Let's hope it gets unblocked soon. :)
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists