[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170831122150.7y2rfvgkppoig5sd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:21:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
Iliyan Malchev <malchev@...gle.com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] ANDROID: binder: add support for RT prio
inheritance.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> Appreciate if you could take a look! In particular I'm curious why
> this approach is considered "dodgy", or "engineered sideways" as
> Thomas pointed out earlier.
The fact that you could not reuse rt_mutex makes me very nervous. Other
than that I cannot say anything because I've not actually looked at any
of the code yet.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists