[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170831095407.0192c343@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:54:07 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: fix debug config symbol in
stack_tracer_{en,dis}able
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 02:01:08 -0500
Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It appears stack_tracer_disable()/stack_tracer_enable() have been
> using the wrong name for the config symbol to enable their
> preempt-debugging checks, which the patch below should fix. (Noticed
> when I made the same mistake attempting to grep for
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT and got two results instead of zero).
>
>
> Zev Weiss
Can you resend with a proper change log (no "Hello") and add a
Signed-off-by tag?
Thanks!
-- Steve
>
> ---
> include/linux/ftrace.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace.h b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> index 6383115e9d2c..2e028854bac7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ftrace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ftrace.h
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, disable_stack_tracer);
> static inline void stack_tracer_disable(void)
> {
> /* Preemption or interupts must be disabled */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG))
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT))
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!preempt_count() || !irqs_disabled());
> this_cpu_inc(disable_stack_tracer);
> }
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static inline void stack_tracer_disable(void)
> */
> static inline void stack_tracer_enable(void)
> {
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG))
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT))
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!preempt_count() || !irqs_disabled());
> this_cpu_dec(disable_stack_tracer);
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists